User Satisfaction and System Environment Convenience for Interface Design of Mobile Games

Fang-Chen Hsu

Ekoloji, 2018, Issue 106, Pages: 1211-1215, Article No: e106104


Download Full Text (PDF)


The convenience and multi-functionality of mobile devices have made mobile gaming an increasingly popular recreation but the industry competition is becoming increasingly fierce. Therefore, making research into the design flow facilitated by the user-interface a worthwhile endeavor. The five of the most popular tower defense game titles in recent years were adopted to be the cases in this study. This study was conducted using an empirical research methodology with semi-structured surveys. The missions or tasks undertaken by participants in these games serve as the bulk of the research on the interface flow. Each participant was assigned four tasks for each game, and then each participant was asked to complete a user satisfaction survey and system environment convenience scale survey. The results show that the interface’s easily recognizable icons and effective tutorials were the reasons for the higher user satisfaction and system environment convenience scale ratings from participants. In addition, the three interface designs, which are (1) unrestricted areas for building, (2) tutorial explanations on the tasks, and (3) options to undo or cancel actions, provide players with a positive experience. Therefore, interface design provides intuitive control, easy-to-identify icons, simple and clear building and upgrading tasks, and well-designed task hints among other features which would help players get through the games more smoothly.


mobile phone, game, interface, user satisfaction, system environment convenience scale


  • Brooke J (1986) System environment convenience Scale (SECS): A Quick-and-Dirty Method of System Evaluation User Information. Digital Equipment Co Ltd, Reading, UK.
  • Brooke J (1996) SECS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194): 4-7.
  • Churchill GA, Peter JP (1984) Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(4): 360-375.
  • Deng L, Poole MS (2010) Affect in web interfaces: A study of the impacts of web page visual complexity and order. MIS Quarterly, 34(4): 711-730.
  • Goto K (2004) Web ReDesign 2.0 | Walkflow that Works. 2 ed.: New Riders.
  • Kotler P (1994) Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control. 8 ed. The Prentice-Hall Series in Marketing: Prentice Hall.
  • Kraft C (2012) User Experience Innovation: User Centered Design that Works. 1 ed.: Apress.
  • Lin P (2005) The study of e-commerce website interface design–Aesthetics v.s. Usability, in Institute of communication studies, National Chiao Tung University: Taiwan.
  • Nielsen J (1993) Usability Engineering. 1 ed.: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Sevener Z (2003) A semantic differential study of the influence of aesthetic properties on product pleasure. In the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces. New York: ACM Press.
  • TzeHui SL, LanSee S (2015) Enhancing User Experience Through Customisation of UI Design. Procedia Manufacturing, 3: 1932-1937.
  • Wilson C (2013) User interface inspection methods: A user-centered design method: Newnes.