The Impact of Sustainable Environmental Management in the Food and Beverage Industry on Customer Loyalty: A View of Brand Attitude

Chih-Yun Yang, Cheng-Hua Yang

Ekoloji, 2019, Issue 107, Pages: 965-972, Article No: e107113


Download Full Text (PDF)


With the development of society and economy, the output value of the service industry has accounted for greater proportion in Taiwan’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measures, especially in the food and beverage (F&B) industry. When the homogeneity of products and services is higher, the market competition is more intense. Under these circumstances, if a restaurant wants to stand out, then it must not only maintain the relationship of existing customers, but also pay attention to society’s perception of it. Therefore, in addition to creating profits and being responsible for the interests of shareholders, enterprises must consider their attitudes toward social responsibility, so that they can achieve a balance between economy and environment. This study took the consumers of Thai Town Cuisine as the empirical subjects, collecting a total of 288 valid questionnaires for a response rate of 80%. The results of statistical analysis and various hypotheses showed that: (1) environmental management has a significant positive correlation with brand attitude; (2) brand attitude has a significant positive correlation with customer loyalty; and (3) environmental management has a significant positive correlation with customer loyalty. Based on these results, this study offers some suggestions and hopes to help managers in the F&B industry to explore how to run their business from the aspect of environmental management, improve product quality, promote customer identity to their brand, and create positive behavior and brand loyalty to the restaurant.


F&B industry, environmental management, brand attitude, customer loyalty


  • Abdelzaher D, Newburry W (2016) Do green policies build green reputations?. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(2): 226-246.
  • Abdul-Rashid SH, Sakundarini N, Raja Ghazilla RA, Thurasamy R (2017) The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(2): 182-204.
  • Ahmadi A, Bouri A (2017) The relationship between financial attributes, environmental performance and environmental disclosure: Empirical investigation on French firms listed on CAC 40. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 28(4): 490-506.
  • Bae HS (2017) The Effect of Environmental Capabilities on Environmental Strategy and Environmental Performance of Korean Exporters for Green Supply Chain Management. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(3): 167-176.
  • Böttcher C, Müller M (2016) Insights on the impact of energy management systems on carbon and corporate performance.An empirical analysis with data from German automotive suppliers.Journal of cleaner production, 137: 1449-1457.
  • Braam GJ, de Weerd LU, Hauck M, Huijbregts MA (2016) Determinants of corporate environmental reporting: The importance of environmental performance and assurance. Journal of cleaner production, 129: 724-734.
  • Campos LM, Vazquez-Brust DA (2016) Lean and green synergies in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(5): 627-641.
  • Chan HK, Yee RW, Dai J, Lim MK (2016) The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181: 384-391.
  • Chen L, Tang O, Feldmann A (2015) Applying GRI reports for the investigation of environmental management practices and company performance in Sweden, China and India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98: 36-46.
  • Chen YS, Chang TW, Lin CY, Lai PY, Wang KH (2016) The influence of proactive green innovation and reactive green innovation on green product development performance: The mediation role of green creativity. Sustainability, 8(10): 966.
  • Choi D, Hwang T (2015) The impact of green supply chain management practices on firm performance: the role of collaborative capability. Operations Management Research, 8(3-4): 69-83.
  • Dai J, Cantor DE, Montabon FL (2017) Examining corporate environmental proactivity and operational performance: A strategy-structure-capabilities-performance perspective within a green context. International Journal of Production Economics, 193: 272-280.
  • Delmas MA, Pekovic S (2015) Resource efficiency strategies and market conditions. Long Range Planning, 48(2): 80-94.
  • Ezzi F, Jarboui A (2016) Does innovation strategy affect financial, social and environmental performance?. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 21(40): 14-24.
  • Feng T, Cai D, Wang D, Zhang X (2016) Environmental management systems and financial performance: the joint effect of switching cost and competitive intensity. Journal of cleaner production, 113: 781-791.
  • Fernando Y, Wah WX (2017) The impact of eco-innovation drivers on environmental performance: Empirical results from the green technology sector in Malaysia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 12: 27-43.
  • Hallam C, Contreras C (2016) Integrating lean and green management.Management Decision, 54(9): 2157-2187.
  • He W, Shen R (2017) ISO 14001 Certification and Corporate Technological Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Firms. Journal of Business Ethics: 1-21.
  • Lewis H (2017) Product Stewardship in Action: The Business Case for Life-cycle Thinking: Routledge.
  • Lozano R (2015) A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1): 32-44.
  • Lu CS, Lai PL, Chiang YP (2016) Container terminal employees’ perceptions of the effects of sustainable supply chain management on sustainability performance. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(5): 597-613.
  • Lu K-C, Liu K (2018) Taiwan: The Water-starved Island. Retrieved from
  • Przychodzen J, Przychodzen W (2015) Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance–evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90: 253-263.
  • Rozar NM, Mahmood WHW, Ibrahim A, Razik MA (2015) A study of success factors in green supply chain management in manufacturing industries in Malaysia. J Econ Bus Manag, 3(2): 287-291.
  • Saeidi SP, Sofian S, Saeidi P, Saeidi SP, Saaeidi SA (2015) How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2): 341-350.
  • Tan Y, Ochoa JJ, Langston C, Shen L (2015) An empirical study on the relationship between sustainability performance and business competitiveness of international construction contractors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93: 273-278.
  • Tang M, Walsh G, Lerner D, Fitza MA, Li Q (2018) Green Innovation, Managerial Concern and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1): 39-51.
  • Wei Z, Shen H, Zhou KZ, Li JJ (2017) How does environmental corporate social responsibility matter in a dysfunctional institutional environment? Evidence from China.Journal of business ethics, 140(2): 209-223.
  • Yadav PL, Han SH, Kim H (2017) Manager’s Dilemma: Stockholders’ and Consumers’ Responses to Corporate Environmental Efforts. Sustainability, 9(7): 1108.
  • Yu J, Lo CWH, Li PHY (2017) Organizational visibility, stakeholder environmental pressure and corporate environmental responsiveness in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3): 371-384.