Simulation Analysis of Toxic Chemical Material Deposition Process Based on Building Protection

Chuang Qiao

Ekoloji, 2019, Issue 108, Pages: 1161-1165


Download Full Text (PDF)


In order to promote the application of green building materials and prevent the damage to the environment and human body caused by toxic chemical materials in buildings, the simulation analysis method of toxic chemical materials deposition process based on building protection was proposed on the premise of full consideration of building protection. By analyzing the three main toxic components of building toxic chemical materials, formaldehyde, asbestos and stupid, the paper summarizes the influence of the use and waste stages of building chemical materials on the ecological environment. According to the influence status, the deposition process of three main toxic substances in building toxic chemical materials was simulated by using physical meteorological deposition technology and flow tank method. According to the simulation results of the deposition process, a set of reasonable and effective measures to prevent the toxic pollution of construction chemical materials are developed, which can meet the requirement of minimizing the impact on the ecological environment under the condition of building protection.


building protection, toxic chemical materials, sedimentary process, simulation


  • Chen BQ, Luo YJ (2017) The Characteristic of Public Cognition of Smog and Its Structural Constraints. Journal of Huzhou Teachers College, 5(1):551-513.
  • Guner, Y., Kizak, V., Saygi, H., Turan, G., Tekogul, H., Karacalar, U., Gulec, F., & Hekimoglu, M. (2016). Production Optimisation of a Land-Based Trout Farm and the Reduction of its Environmental Effects. Ekoloji 25(98): 41-51.
  • Herrerafranco, G., Alvaradomacancela, N., Gavínquinchuela, T., & Carriónmero, P. (2018). Participatory Socio-Ecological System: Manglaralto-Santa Elena, Ecuador. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes 2(4): 303-310.
  • Jing W, Chang I S, Yilihamu Q, et al (2017) Study on the practice of public participation in environmental impact assessment by environmental non-governmental organizations in China. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 749(3):86-200.
  • Liu N, Xu WY, Xiao Q, et al (2018) Study on the role of non - profit environmental organizations in prevention and control of smog from the perspective of environmental ethics. Inner Mongolia Environmental Sciences 3(4):256-258.
  • Lührs N, Jager N W, Challies E, et al (2018) How Participatory Should Environmental Governance Be? Testing the Applicability of the Vroom-Yetton-Jago Model in Public Environmental Decision-Making. Environmental Management 61(2):249-262.
  • Moon K, Blackman D, Brewer T D, et al (2017) Environmental governance for urgent and uncertain problems. Biological Invasions 19(3):785-797.
  • Schoon M, York A, Sullivan A, et al (2017) The emergence of an environmental governance network: the case of the Arizona borderlands. Regional Environmental Change 17(3):1-13.
  • Yang, X. P., Luo, N., Zong, Y. Y., Jia, Z. H., & Liao, X. J. (2017). Quantum Dots Extraction Coupled with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 15(3): 171-186.
  • Zhang Y, Wang M, Jin GH, et al (2017) Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Atmospheric Environment under Influence of Human Activities. Journal of Jilin University (Science Edition) 12(4):23-25.