Modeling Analysis of the Fierce Influence of Environmental Governance on Small Science and Technology of Enterprises

Jing Liu

Ekoloji, 2019, Issue 108, Pages: 1129-1135

OPEN ACCESS

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Based on the theory of resource basis the theory of knowledge foundation and the thought of knowledge management, the relationship model between environmental governance and small science and technology enterprises is constructed, a survey of the employees of 436 science and technology enterprises, analyzing the fierce influence of environmental governance on small scientific and technological enterprises. The results show that, the environmental governance has the direct and indirect promoting effect on the science and technology small enterprises at the same time, the corresponding countermeasures should be put forward from both the government and the enterprise; First of all, the regional government needs to improve the environment for infrastructure construction, the key to establish a major research and development institutions Science and technology public service platform high technology research and the key of the scientific research infrastructure laboratory et. Though building positive and negative excitation material incentive and non-material incentive, encouraged communication among employees, construction of small scientific and technological enterprises well.

Keywords

environmental governance, small science and technology enterprises, Intense effect, modeling analysis

References

  • Biela, R., Sopikova, L. (2017). Efficiency of Sorption Materials on the Removal of Lead From Water. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 15(3): 1527-1536.
  • Dan G, Young O, Jing Y, et al.(2018) Environmental governance in China: Interactions between the state and “nonstate actors”. Journal of Environmental Management 220:126-135.
  • Ding, Y., Zhou, H., Lu, Y., Liu, J., Chen, Z., & Dai, X. (2019). Design of Foot Bolts for Weak Roof Storage Tanks to Avoid Environmental Pollution. Ekoloji 28: 3643-3651.
  • Guo Xiumei. (2017)New Modeling Method for an Electronic Jamming/Radar System in System Confrontation. Journal Academy of Electronics and Information Technology China (3):267-270.
  • Karaoui, I., Arioua, A., Idrissi, A. E. A., Hssaisoune, M., Nouaim, W., Ouhamchich, K. A., & Elhamdouni, D. (2018). Assessing Land Use /Cover Variation Effects on Flood Intensity via Hydraulic Simulations: A Case Study of Oued El Abid Watershed (Morocco). Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes 2(2): 73-80.
  • Landauer M, Komendantova N. (2018) Participatory environmental governance of infrastructure projects affecting reindeer husbandry in the Arctic Journal of Environmental Management 223:385-395.
  • Li G, He Q, Shao S, et al. (2018) Environmental non-governmental organizations and urban environmental governance: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management 206:1296.
  • Li Y, Deng Q, Zhou C, et al. (2018) Environmental governance strategies in a two-echelon supply chain with tax and subsidy interactions Annals of Operations Research: 1-24.
  • Lührs N, Jager N W, Challies E, et al. (2018) How Participatory Should Environmental Governance Be Testing the Applicability of the Vroom-Yetton-Jago Model in Public Environmental Decision-Making. Environmental Management 61(2):249-262.
  • Moon K, Blackman D, Brewer T D, et al. (2017) Environmental governance for urgent and uncertain problems. Biological Invasions 19(3):785-797.
  • Rose A. (2018) Distributional Considerations for Transboundary Risk Governance of Environmental Threats. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 9(4):445-453.
  • Schoon M, York A, Sullivan A, et al. (2017) The emergence of an environmental governance network: the case of the Arizona borderlands. Regional Environmental Change 17(3):1-13.
  • Xuan Z, Hui H, Dong Z, et al. (2017) Environmental Performance Index at the Provincial Level for China 2006–2011. Ecological Indicators 75:48-56.