Çevreyi Korumada Yeni Bir Kavram: Ekolojik Ego


Ekoloji, 2006, Issue 58, Pages: 33-37


Download Full Text (PDF)


The relation of human being with man and nature is built by ego. Ecological ego is critical element in relations between man and nature, while healthy ego with good character is more important in human relations. Ecological ego is thestabile state of ego which gives mentally, emotionally and behaviourly no harm to nature, but also respectful to all creatures. Environmental problems are mainly derived from ill-relations of ego and environment. Understanding the ecology of ego is important as much as the understanding of nature ecology since self survival based attitudes and behaviours of ego affects primarily environmental health. The research data from environmental sciences makes little contribution to environmental conservation, since the primary research objective in environmental sciences are not targeted to controlling of human passions and behaviours damaging to nature. The degree of ecological awareness and consciousness are dependent on the awareness of ego. It is quite difficult to solve environmental problems unless understanding of ecology of ego and building up ecological ego states. If functions of ego regulating internally thinking, emotion and behaviour could be controlled by ethical values of ecopsychology (not to give harm, to be respectful, to make contribution to nature), then it would be possible to control and manage the attitudes and behaviours harmful to environment.


Ecological ego, ecopsychology, environmental conservation, healthy ecosystem


  • Abel T, Stepp JR ( 2003) A new ecosystems ecology for anthropology. Conservation Ecology 7, 3, 12. Aunger R (2002) The Electric Meme: A New Theory of How We Think. The Free Pres, Newyork.
  • Bouchard TJ, Loehlin JC (2001) Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics 31, 243-273. Caro T (1999) The behaviour-conservation interface. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14, 9, 366-369. Carr D (2004) Moral Values and the Arts in Environmental Education: Towards an Ethics of Aesthetic Appreciation. Journal of Philosophy of Education 38, 2, 221.
  • Feldman MW, Laland KN (1996) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, 453-457.
  • Garner A (2003) Spirituality and Sustainability. Conservation Biology 17, 4, 946-947.
  • Heemskerk M, Wilson K, Pavao-Zuckerman M (2003) Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Conservation Ecology 7, 3, 8.
  • Hibbard W (2003) Ecopsychology: A Review. The Trumpeter 19, 2.
  • Naveh Z (1995) Interactions of landscapes and cultures., Landscape and Urban Planning 32, 1, 43-54. Palombo SR (1999) The Emergent Ego: Complexity and Coevolution in the Psychoanalytic Process. International Universities Press Inc, Guilford, USA.
  • Pandey DN (2003) Cultural Resources for Conservation Science. The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 17, 2, 633-635.
  • Pavao-Zuckerman MA (2000) The conceptual utility of models in human ecology. Journal of Ecological Anthropology 4, 37-56.
  • Rowe S (2003). The Living Earth and Its Ethical Priority . The Trumpeter 19, 2.
  • Step JR, Jones EC, Pavao-Zuckerman M, Casagrande D, Zarger RK (2003) Remarkable properties of human ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 7, 3, 11.
  • Trombulak SC, Omland KS, Robinson JA, Lusk JJ, Fleischner TL, Brown G, Domroese M (2004) Principles of Conservation Biology: Recommended Guidelines for Conservation Literacy from the Education Committee of the Society for Conservation Biology. Conservation Biology 18, 5, 1180-1190.
  • Trudgill S (2001) Psychobiogeography: meanings of nature and motivations for a democratized conservation ethic. Journal of Biogeography 28, 677-698.