Agroecological Study: Environmental Effect of Scientific Technology and Education Input on Agricultural Economic Growth

Mo-Li Xu

Ekoloji, 2018, Issue 106, Pages: 969-974, Article No: e106171

OPEN ACCESS

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

According to generalized C-D production function, this paper analyzes the environmental effect of scientific technology and education input on agricultural economic growth based on the panel data from the year of 2004-2015 in Zhejiang province, by using the modern econometric methods of panel unit root and cointegration test. The result shows that agricultural scientific technology and education input play an active role on agricultural economic growth and the research funding and cultivable acres in particular weight most. Based on this conclusion, some relevant proposals are put forward which can provide references for the adjustment and management of agricultural scientific input and education in Zhejiang province.

Keywords

agroecology, agricultural scientific input, generalized C-D production function, panel data, agricultural scientific education

References

  • Felipe J, Mccombie JSL (2015) The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change. Review of Radical Political Economics.
  • Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661–1707.
  • Guellec D, van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B (2001) The internationalization of technology analyzed with patent data, Research Policy, (3): 1253–1266. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00149-9
  • Inekwe JN (2015) The contribution of R&D expenditure to economic growth in developing economies. Social Indicators Research, 124(3): 727–745. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0807-3
  • Inglesi-Lotz R, Chang T, Gupta R (2015) Causality between research output and economic growth in BRICS. Quality & Quantity, 49(1): 167–176.
  • Kancs D, Siliverstovs B (2016) R&D and non-linear productivity growth ☆. Research Policy, 45(3): 634–646. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.12.001
  • Kumar RR, Stauvermann PJ, Patel A (2015) Exploring the link between research and economic growth: an empirical study of China and USA. Quality & Quantity, 50(3): 1–19.
  • Lucas Jr RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1): 3–42.
  • Mcarthur JW, Mccord GC (2017) Fertilizing growth: Agricultural inputs and their effects in economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 127: 133–152.
  • Njogo BO, Sylvester J (2013) An empirical estimation of the nexus between agricultural farm inputs and economic growth in Nigeria. Invertebrate Biology, 129(3): 252–265.
  • Petrescu AS (2009) Science and technology for economic growth. New insights from when the data contradicts desktop models 1. Review of Policy Research, 26(6): 839–880.
  • Pottelsberghe BV, Guellec D (1999) Does government support stimulates private R&D. Ulb Institutional Repository.
  • Self S, Grabowski R (2007) Economic development and the role of agricultural technology. Agricultural Economics, 36(3): 395–404.
  • Wang B (2010) Impulse response analysis of the impact of agricultural science and technology investment on economic growth. Agricultural Economy, (9): 25–31.
  • Wang H, Wu D (2015) An explanation for China’s economic growth: Expenditure on R&D promotes economic growth —Based on China’s provincial panel data of 1997-2013. Journal of Service Science & Management, 08 (6): 809–816. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2015.86082
  • Zhu K, Guo H, Diao F, Xu S (2008) A better estimate to the contribution rate of education on economic growth in China from 1999 to 2003. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(2): 1371–1383.